1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 would be higher. At 5,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (402 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2010 Cadillac CTS. (270 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 should accelerate faster than 2010 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 206 kg more than 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 (580 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM). This means 1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

1991 Mercedes-Benz C 112 2010 Cadillac CTS
Make Mercedes-Benz Cadillac
Model C 112 CTS
Year Released 1991 2010
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 5987 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 402 HP 270 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 580 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 5700 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1550 kg 1756 kg
Vehicle Length 4620 mm 4867 mm
Vehicle Width 1980 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1210 mm 1504 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 68 L