1991 Mini MK VI vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (246 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1991 Mini MK VI. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1991 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 741 kg more than 1991 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (330 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mini MK VI. (116 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Mini MK VI | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Mini | Volvo |
| Model | MK VI | S60 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2319 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 246 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6130 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 116 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2650 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1476 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2720 mm |
