1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT vs. 1966 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 ZAZ Jalta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 ZAZ Jalta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT (427 Nm) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 ZAZ Jalta. (52 Nm). This means 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT | 1966 ZAZ Jalta | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | ZAZ |
| Model | 3000GT | Jalta |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
