1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT vs. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT (427 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (318 Nm). This means 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT has manual transmission. 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT | 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
Model | 3000GT | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 427 Nm | 318 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |