1991 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2010 Acura ZDX
To start off, 2010 Acura ZDX is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Acura ZDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura ZDX (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura ZDX should accelerate faster than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura ZDX weights approximately 420 kg more than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Acura ZDX (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Acura ZDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2010 Acura ZDX | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Acura |
Model | Sigma | ZDX |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4887 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1994 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1595 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2751 mm |