1991 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2010 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2010 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Buick LaCrosse (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Buick LaCrosse. (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Buick LaCrosse.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2010 Buick LaCrosse | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Buick |
Model | Sigma | LaCrosse |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5001 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1857 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2837 mm |