1991 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 176 kg more than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Cadillac |
Model | Sigma | CTS |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2880 mm |