1991 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2010 Seat Altea
To start off, 2010 Seat Altea is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2010 Seat Altea. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma should accelerate faster than 2010 Seat Altea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 278 kg more than 2010 Seat Altea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Seat Altea. (200 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Seat Altea.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2010 Seat Altea | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Seat |
Model | Sigma | Altea |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1192 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2470 mm |