1991 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma weights approximately 13 kg more than 2013 Volvo C30.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma. (251 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Sigma | C30 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1457 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4266 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2039 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1447 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2640 mm |
