1991 Nissan Micra vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1991 Nissan Micra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1991 Nissan Micra. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1991 Nissan Micra.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Nissan Micra. (73 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Nissan Micra | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Micra | 66 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 988 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |