1991 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel

To start off, 1991 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 215 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Nissan Pulsar (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1991 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.

Compare all specifications:

1991 Nissan Pulsar 1966 Riley Kestrel
Make Nissan Riley
Model Pulsar Kestrel
Year Released 1991 1966
Engine Size 1596 cc 1098 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 108 HP 53 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 147 Nm 83 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1100 kg 885 kg
Vehicle Length 4150 mm 3730 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1540 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2380 mm