1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,351 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (200 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 70 kg more than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass has manual transmission. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1999 Acura CL | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Acura |
Model | Cutlass | CL |
Year Released | 1991 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3351 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2715 mm |