1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2000 Volvo V70
To start off, 2000 Volvo V70 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,351 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (197 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2000 Volvo V70. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2000 Volvo V70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo V70 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (291 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volvo V70. (290 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2000 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Cutlass | V70 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3351 cc | 2459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 290 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2770 mm |