1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,351 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 210 kg more than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass has manual transmission. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
Model | Cutlass | Ranger |
Year Released | 1991 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3351 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3010 mm |