1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass (163 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2011 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass has manual transmission. 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
| Model | Cutlass | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2490 mm |
