1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 6 kg more than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Cutlass | C30 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2639 mm |