1991 Opel Astra vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1991 Opel Astra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,389 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Opel Astra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Opel Astra (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Opel Astra should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Opel Astra weights approximately 87 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Opel Astra (104 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1991 Opel Astra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Opel Astra | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Opel | Riley |
| Model | Astra | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 1389 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 104 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 888 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2380 mm |
