1991 Opel Omega vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Opel Omega would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Opel Omega (110 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1991 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Opel Omega | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Opel | Ford |
| Model | Omega | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2490 mm |
