1991 Renault 25 vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1991 Renault 25 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1991 Renault 25. (102 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Renault 25 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Renault 25 | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Renault | Sunbeam |
Model | 25 | Tiger |
Year Released | 1991 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2190 mm |