1991 Renault Clio vs. 1946 Triumph 1800
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Triumph 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Triumph 1800 would be higher. At 1,774 cc (4 cylinders), 1946 Triumph 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Triumph 1800 (64 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1946 Triumph 1800 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Triumph 1800 weights approximately 237 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Triumph 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Triumph 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Renault Clio | 1946 Triumph 1800 | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | Clio | 1800 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1946 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1170 cc | 1774 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.8 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 64.9 mm | 106 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
