1991 Renault Clio vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (93 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1967 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Renault Clio | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | Clio | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 64 L |
