1991 Renault Clio vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (80 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (107 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Renault Clio | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Renault | Triumph |
Model | Clio | 2000 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |