1991 Renault Clio vs. 1968 Volvo 145

To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 145 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo 145 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Volvo 145 (81 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (80 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Volvo 145 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 145 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Volvo 145 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 145. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Volvo 145 (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (107 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1968 Volvo 145 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications: