1991 Renault Clio vs. 1972 Holden Torana

To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Holden Torana would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (93 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Renault Clio weights approximately 65 kg more than 1972 Holden Torana. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Torana. (131 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Torana. 1972 Holden Torana has automatic transmission and 1991 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1991 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Holden Torana will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: