1991 Renault Clio vs. 1972 Saab 99
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Saab 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Saab 99 would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Saab 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Saab 99 (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (93 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Saab 99 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Saab 99 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Saab 99 (167 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1972 Saab 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Renault Clio | 1972 Saab 99 | |
| Make | Renault | Saab |
| Model | Clio | 99 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 62 L |
