1991 Renault Clio vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. Both 1991 Renault Clio and 1979 Volvo 66 are equipped with a 1,108 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Volvo 66 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Renault Clio | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | Clio | 66 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 48 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
