1991 Renault Clio vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (80 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (107 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Renault Clio | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | Clio | 66 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |