1991 Renault Clio vs. 1982 TVR Tasmin
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 TVR Tasmin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 TVR Tasmin would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 TVR Tasmin is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 TVR Tasmin weights approximately 120 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Because 1982 TVR Tasmin is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 TVR Tasmin. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Renault Clio | 1982 TVR Tasmin | |
| Make | Renault | TVR |
| Model | Clio | Tasmin |
| Year Released | 1991 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2390 mm |
