1991 Renault Clio vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 290 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Renault Clio | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1991 | 1989 |
Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1910 mm |