1991 Renault Clio vs. 1998 Rover 400
To start off, 1998 Rover 400 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover 400 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (93 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 400 (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1998 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Renault Clio | 1998 Rover 400 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Clio | 400 |
Year Released | 1991 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2560 mm |