1991 Renault Clio vs. 1999 Rover 75

To start off, 1999 Rover 75 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (93 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Rover 75 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Rover 75 (185 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1999 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio. 1999 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 1991 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1991 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: