1991 Renault Clio vs. 2002 Samsung SM3

To start off, 2002 Samsung SM3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Samsung SM3 (95 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Samsung SM3 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Samsung SM3 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Samsung SM3 (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2002 Samsung SM3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio. 2002 Samsung SM3 has automatic transmission and 1991 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1991 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Samsung SM3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: