1991 Renault Clio vs. 2003 Lancia Zeta

To start off, 2003 Lancia Zeta is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lancia Zeta (134 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (48 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 792 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lancia Zeta (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio. 2003 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 1991 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1991 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1991 Renault Clio 2003 Lancia Zeta
Make Renault Lancia
Model Clio Zeta
Year Released 1991 2003
Body Type Hatchback Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1108 cc 1910 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 48 HP 134 HP
Torque 81 Nm 190 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4100 RPM
Engine Bore Size 70 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 11.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 810 kg 1602 kg
Vehicle Length 3710 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2830 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 80 L