1991 Renault Clio vs. 2004 Tata E

To start off, 2004 Tata E is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Tata E weights approximately 455 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Tata E (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2004 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.

Compare all specifications: