1991 Renault Clio vs. 2004 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (161 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 525 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (220 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (118 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Renault Clio | 2004 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Clio | Camry |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.9 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.6 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 70 L |
