1991 Renault Clio vs. 2007 Toyota Avalon
To start off, 2007 Toyota Avalon is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,458 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Toyota Avalon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Avalon (269 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (93 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Avalon should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Toyota Avalon weights approximately 613 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Toyota Avalon (334 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2007 Toyota Avalon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio. 2007 Toyota Avalon has automatic transmission and 1991 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1991 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Toyota Avalon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Renault Clio | 2007 Toyota Avalon | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Avalon |
Year Released | 1991 | 2007 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 3458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 334 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1608 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.8 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 70 L |