1991 Renault Clio vs. 2007 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2007 Toyota Corolla is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Corolla (127 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Toyota Corolla weights approximately 515 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Toyota Corolla (170 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2007 Toyota Corolla will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio. 2007 Toyota Corolla has automatic transmission and 1991 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1991 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Toyota Corolla will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Renault Clio | 2007 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | Clio | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2007 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 91.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 161 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.9 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.6 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 60 L |
