1991 Renault Clio vs. 2008 Tata Nano
To start off, 2008 Tata Nano is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (93 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Renault Clio weights approximately 395 kg more than 2008 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Renault Clio | 2008 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Renault | Tata |
| Model | Clio | Nano |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 37 L |
