1991 Renault Clio vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,436 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 651 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Renault Clio | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Condor |
Year Released | 1991 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2436 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1646 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 70 L |