1991 Renault Clio vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (107 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 475 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Renault Clio | 2012 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Renault | Mitsubishi |
Model | Clio | Colt |
Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.7 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.5 mm | 75.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.2 seconds | 12 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.9 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.3 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 47 L |