1991 Renault Espace vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Espace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Espace would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1991 Renault Espace. (93 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Espace.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Renault Espace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Espace. (183 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Espace.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Renault Espace | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Renault | Citroen |
Model | Espace | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1991 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 87 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |