1991 Rover 100 vs. 2006 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Smart ForTwo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Rover 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Rover 100 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Rover 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Rover 100 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForTwo. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1991 Rover 100 should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Rover 100 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2006 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1991 Rover 100 (135 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Smart ForTwo. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1991 Rover 100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Rover 100 | 2006 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Rover | Smart |
Model | 100 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 67 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |