1991 Rover 400 vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Rover 400 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 299 more horse power than 1991 Rover 400. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1991 Rover 400.
Because 2012 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-250 (548 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Rover 400. (180 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Rover 400 | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Rover | Ford |
| Model | 400 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 548 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1966 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3967 mm |
