1991 Suzuki Alto vs. 2012 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2012 Smart ForTwo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2012 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Smart ForTwo (71 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1991 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1991 Suzuki Alto.
Because 2012 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Smart ForTwo (125 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Suzuki Alto | 2012 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Suzuki | Smart |
| Model | Alto | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 795 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 59 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
