1991 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 476 kg more than 1991 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1991 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Toyota Lite Ace | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Lite Ace | C70 |
Year Released | 1991 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1452 cc | 2521 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1576 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1430 mm |