1991 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2006 Volvo V50
To start off, 2006 Volvo V50 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,345 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1991 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Volvo V50 has automatic transmission and 1991 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1991 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Volvo V50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Toyota Lite Ace | 2006 Volvo V50 | |
| Make | Toyota | Volvo |
| Model | Lite Ace | V50 |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 1452 cc | 2345 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1460 mm |
