1991 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2010 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2010 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Transit Connect weights approximately 474 kg more than 1991 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1991 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Transit Connect has automatic transmission and 1991 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1991 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Transit Connect will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1991 Toyota Lite Ace | 2010 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Toyota | Ford |
Model | Lite Ace | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1452 cc | 2000 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 136 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1796 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 2014 mm |