1991 Volvo 245 vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1991 Volvo 245. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1991 Volvo 245.
Because 1991 Volvo 245 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Volvo 245. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (230 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Volvo 245. (143 Nm). This means 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Volvo 245.
Compare all specifications:
| 1991 Volvo 245 | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
| Make | Volvo | Suzuki |
| Model | 245 | Kizashi |
| Year Released | 1991 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2383 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 185 HP |
| Torque | 143 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1481 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
