1992 Acura Integra vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Acura Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1992 Acura Integra | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Acura | Jeep |
| Model | Integra | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1992 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1700 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4684 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1798 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2946 mm |
