1992 Acura NSX vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Acura NSX would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Acura NSX (272 HP @ 7300 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (213 HP @ 2800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1992 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1075 kg more than 1992 Acura NSX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Acura NSX. (284 Nm @ 5400 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Acura NSX.
Compare all specifications:
1992 Acura NSX | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | NSX | Econoline |
Year Released | 1992 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 7275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 272 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 7300 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Torque | 284 Nm | 575 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 2445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3510 mm |